2. Wu H, Sun W, Huang X, Yu S, Wang H, Bi X, et al. Online antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):1–5.
3. WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. WHO. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
4. Wang CL, Liu YY, Wu CH, Wang CY, Wang CH, Long CY. Impact of covid-19 on pregnancy. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(3):763–7.
5. Murphy HR. Managing Diabetes in Pregnancy Before, During, and After COVID-19. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020;22(6):454–61.
6. Durankuş F, Aksu E. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: a preliminary study. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2020;0(0):1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1763946
7. Tozour JN, Bandremer S, Patberg E, Zavala J, Akerman M, Chavez M, et al. Application of telemedicine video visits in a maternal-fetal medicine practice at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM [Internet]. 2021;3(6):1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100469
8. WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience [Internet]. WHO. 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf
9. Abraham C. Rethinking the Traditional Prenatal Care Model. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1024–6.
10. Kemenkes. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2020 [Internet]. Kemenkes RI. 2021. Available from: https://www.kemkes.go.id/downloads/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-indonesia/Profil-Kesehatan-Indonesia-Tahun-2020.pdf
11. Shields AD, Wagner RK, Knutzen D, Deering S, Nielsen PE. Maintaining access to maternal fetal medicine care by telemedicine during a global pandemic. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;0(0):1–12.
12. Basha GW. Factors Affecting the Utilization of a Minimum of Four Antenatal Care Services in Ethiopia. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2019;2019:1–6.
13. Montagnoli C, Zanconato G, Ruggeri S, Cinelli G, Tozzi AE. Restructuring maternal services during the covid-19 pandemic: Early results of a scoping review for non-infected women. Midwifery. 2021;94(December 2020):1–6.
14. Nove A, Moyo NT, Bokosi M, Garg S. The Midwifery Services Framework: The process of implementation. Midwifery. 2018;58(December 2017):96–101.
15. Gjoni M, Alevizou E. Postnatal virtual and home visits by midwives during COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Midwifery. 2020;4(April):4–5.
16. Pflugeisen BM, Mou J. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(7):1544–51.
17. Beattie RM. The changing face of coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(12):955–6.
18. Weigel G, Frederiksen B, Ranji U. Telemedicine and Pregnancy Care [Internet]. KFF. 2020. Available from: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/telemedicine-and-pregnancy-care/
19. Moyo J, Madziyire G. Use of telemedicine in obstetrics and gynaecology in zimbabwe during a lockdown period. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35(Supp 2):1–4.
20. Nelson GA, Holschuh C. Evaluation of Telehealth Use in Prenatal Care for Patient and Provider Satisfaction: A Step Toward Reducing Barriers to Care. J Nurse Pract [Internet]. 2021;17(4):481–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.12.026
21. CMS. Telemedicine [Internet]. Medicaid. 2020. Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/telemedicine/index.html
22. Wijono D. Manajemen Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan. Airlangga University Press; 1999. 619 p.
23. Kotler P, Keller KL. Marketing Management [Internet]. Pearson; 2012. 10 p. Available from: http://eprints.stiperdharmawacana.ac.id/24/1/%5BPhillip_Kotler%5D_Marketing_Management_14th_Edition%28BookFi%29.pdf
24. Hekkert KD, Cihangir S, Kleefstra SM, van den Berg B, Kool RB. Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2009;69(1):68–75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.016
25. Liu CH, Goyal D, Mittal L, Erdei C. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual-Based Prenatal Care: Implications after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Matern Child Health J [Internet]. 2021;25(11):1735–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03211-6
26. Chandra S, Ward P, Mohammadnezhad M. Factors associated with patient satisfaction in outpatient department of Suva sub-divisional health center, Fiji, 2018: A mixed method study. Front Public Heal. 2019;7(JUL):1–10.
27. Abtahi AM, Brodke DS, Lawrence BD, Zhang C, Spiker WR. Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores in a spine surgery patient population. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2014;97(10):824–8.
28. Greenley JR, Young TB, Schoenherr RA. Psychological Distress and Patient Satisfaction. Med Care. 1982;XX(4):1–13.
29. Nakagawa K, Umazume T, Mayama M, Chiba K, Saito Y, Noshiro K, et al. Survey of attitudes of individuals who underwent remote prenatal check-ups and consultations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(7):2380–6.
30. Quinn LM, Olajide O, Green M, Sayed H, Ansar H. Patient and professional experiences with virtual antenatal clinics during the covid-19 pandemic in a uk tertiary obstetric hospital: Questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(8):1–9.
31. Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth Benefits and Barriers. J Nurse Pract [Internet]. 2021 Feb;17(2):218–21. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1555415520305158
32. Saljoughian M. The Benefits and Limitations of Telehealth [Internet]. Pharmacy and Technology. 2021. p. 5–8. Available from: https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/the-benefits-and-limitations-of-telehealth
33. Zork NM, Aubey J, Yates H. Conversion and optimization of telehealth in obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(6):1–5.
34. Jeganathan S, Prasannan L, Blitz MJ, Vohra N, Rochelson B, Meirowitz N. Adherence and acceptability of telehealth appointments for high-risk obstetrical patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM [Internet]. 2020;2(4):100233. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100233
35. Lapadula MC, Rolfs S, Szyld EG, Hallford G, Clark T, McCoy M, et al. Evaluating Patients’ and Neonatologists’ Satisfaction With the Use of Telemedicine for Neonatology Prenatal Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Pediatr. 2021;9(March):1–8.
36. Futterman I, Rosenfeld E, Toaff M, Boucher T, Golden-Espinal S, Evans K, et al. Addressing Disparities in Prenatal Care via Telehealth during COVID-19: Prenatal Satisfaction Survey in East Harlem. Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(1):088–92.
37. Holcomb D, Faucher MA, Bouzid J, Quint-Bouzid M, Nelson DB, Duryea E. Patient perspectives on audio-only virtual prenatal visits amidst the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):317–22.
38. Isautier JMJ, Copp T, Ayre J, Cvejic E, Meyerowitz-Katz G, Batcup C, et al. People’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):1–11.
- Abstract viewed - 834 times
- PDF downloaded - 841 times
Downloads
Affiliations
Iva Satya Ratnasari
Program Studi Kebidanan Kediri, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Malang
Indah Rahmaningtyas
Program Studi Kebidanan Kediri, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Malang
Finta Isti Kundarti
Program Studi Kebidanan Kediri, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Malang
How to Cite
Penerapan Penggunaan Telehealth terhadap Kepuasan Ibu Hamil pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : A Systematic Review
Vol 13 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Kesehatan Terpadu (Integrated Health Journal) November 2022
Submitted: May 19, 2022
Published: Dec 3, 2022
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decrease pregnant women visit to health services and changes in health care. Various midwifery services have been developed using telehealth. The purpose of this study was to 2022. Results: 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. The research were conducted in United States, England, Japan, and Zimbabwe. The use of telehealth for pregnant women during the COVID-19 analyze the effect of using telehealth on the satisfaction of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic through systematic review study. The method was to search through Pubmed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Wiley Library databases with the publication year from December 2019 to January pandemic resulted in high satisfaction and appeared in 10 articles. Only 1 article resulted in lower satisfaction. Telehealth in the future will be very useful and become an innovation in the field of obstetrics, especially to provide pregnancy care even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends. Although the use of telehealth still has limitations in physical examination, it can be used as an adjunct and complement to in-person visits. Further research can be conducted to develop research on the factors that influence the satisfaction of implementing telehealth in pregnant women.